1996-10-12 - Re: Prove it in Court First

Header Data

From: the prisoner <the_village@null.gov>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a069f02d647d7f6e4e261a1fd983d41ea4904504a7a27aa75f75383b941e77bb
Message ID: <325F6A2E.3869@null.gov>
Reply To: <3.0b19.32.19961012103434.00760128@panix.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-12 16:14:19 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 09:14:19 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: the prisoner <the_village@null.gov>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 09:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Prove it in Court First
In-Reply-To: <3.0b19.32.19961012103434.00760128@panix.com>
Message-ID: <325F6A2E.3869@null.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Duncan Frissell wrote:
> 
> >From the Software Publisher's Association Code of Conduct for ISPs:
> 
> "It is also a violation of the copyright owner's rights for an ISP to post,
> or to allow others to use its server(s) to post, materials, like serial
> numbers or cracker utilities, that make it possible for others to execute
> and use pirated software.  Such acts, which either induce or materially
> contribute to copyright infringement by someone else, constitute
> contributory infringement, and expose ISPs to the same liability for
> damages, penalties and injunctive relief as a direct infringer."
> 

/\    /\

This is supposed to have a legal basis?

Duncan, it's even easier. Here ya go:

1. Buy a copy of Windows 95.
2. Install it on a machine.
3. Install it on a second machine.

There, SPA: you can now go sue every ISP from which every reader of
this list obtains their mail.  They have just published information 
on how to pirate Windows '95.





Thread