From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 22:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
To: Steve Schear <azur@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: crypto wish list (was Re: A "RIGHT" to strong crypto?)
In-Reply-To: <v02130500ae8830318248@[10.0.2.15]>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9610142243.A8394-0100000@netcom14>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain





On Mon, 14 Oct 1996, Steve Schear wrote:
[On a PipeNet like design, but without the traffic analysis defending 
features.]
> The shortcoming of Ray's approach is that it requires intermediate servers
> to re-route all client-server packets and therefore someone must provide
> that, considerable, bandwidth for free or fee.

As I said, I'll fund the second node. But I don't expect somebody to 
donate a T1. They will expect compensation. Perhaps via Ecash. The new 
Ecashlib should do the job just fine. <http://www.digicash.com/api/>

> If someone were to set up a real-time BlackNet it could provide a superset
> of Decense and also offer considerably improved anonymity.  I've heard some
> months ago that such a project is under consideration.
That would be nice.

--Lucky