From: Geoff Klein <geoff@commtouch.co.il>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 1996 06:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
To: raph@cs.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: pgp, edi, s/mime
Message-ID: <199610111301.GAA02247@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

To: andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com, raph@cs.berkeley.edu,
 cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Fri Oct 11 15:08:58 1996

> Raph Levien writes:
> >  In sum, S/MIME leaves PGP in the dust, both techically and as
> >  a market force.

Disagree:

1. Technical superiority of S/MIME over PGP is arguable.

2. It will be some time (if ever) before you will be able to communicate 
securely using S/MIME across US borders.


- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Geoff Klein,     Pronto Secure Product Manager
http://www.commtouch.com, Tel: 972-9-963445 (ext 130), Fax: 972-9-961053
For my PGP public key send mail with subject: Get Key
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBMl443ULv5OMYFK1FAQEWmQQAljOoIDcxoaOdOHWW9EurIsMsGt85Wmkn
65slX58eONq3LdkLY+NEEIG/bpIZIzcy0wQO7aWX2qQdJRYBSBSmHzDxb4A07cJM
AN3c5q3pRZzB27iKJHlsPtoauvRE+O0LAwTRz+0zhNfAwsDcvttfYXTE8AycwtoY
DCuPGrR1s6g=
=/otj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----