1996-10-10 - Re: pgp, edi, s/mime
Header Data
From: Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
To: Raph Levien <raph@cs.berkeley.edu>
Message Hash: b9997545b7579873360d6424ce68b4e316bae22ce8b47fae4e745d0a56ec8348
Message ID: <9610101609.AA01024@ch1d157nwk>
Reply To: <199610091521.KAA26969@wpg-01.escape.ca>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-10 16:09:22 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 09:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Raw message
From: Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 09:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: Raph Levien <raph@cs.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: pgp, edi, s/mime
In-Reply-To: <199610091521.KAA26969@wpg-01.escape.ca>
Message-ID: <9610101609.AA01024@ch1d157nwk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Raph Levien writes:
> In sum, S/MIME leaves PGP in the dust, both techically and as
> a market force.
But does S/MIME still leave important sender and recipient information in the clear?
True, PGP is four years old and isn't as up-to-date anymore, but PGP 3.0 is
supposed to have an important feature (although we will have to wait a year
for it): it is unencumbered by patents.
andrew
Thread
Return to October 1996
- Return to “Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>”
- Return to “Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>”
- Return to “Raph Levien <raph@cs.berkeley.edu>”
- Return to “ratak (Jason E.J. Manaigre) <ratak@escape.ca>”
Return to “sameer@c2.net”
- 1996-10-09 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 08:19:40 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: pgp, edi, s/mime - ratak (Jason E.J. Manaigre) <ratak@escape.ca>
- 1996-10-10 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 18:08:22 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: pgp, edi, s/mime - Raph Levien <raph@cs.berkeley.edu>
- 1996-10-10 (Thu, 10 Oct 1996 09:09:22 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: pgp, edi, s/mime - Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
- 1996-10-10 (Thu, 10 Oct 1996 09:51:19 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: pgp, edi, s/mime - Raph Levien <raph@cs.berkeley.edu>
- 1996-10-10 (Thu, 10 Oct 1996 13:01:59 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: pgp, edi, s/mime - sameer@c2.net
- 1996-10-10 (Thu, 10 Oct 1996 16:01:50 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: pgp, edi, s/mime - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>