1996-10-04 - Re: RSA’s position on espionage-enabled crypto.

Header Data

From: The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
To: Peter Trei <trei@process.com>
Message Hash: bd267c9604731926f3d2075040da3383d6aff04fc6ce32ca160e2edee741cd2a
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.94.961004015948.647A-100000@random.sp.org>
Reply To: <199610032013.NAA23928@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-04 11:31:09 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 19:31:09 +0800

Raw message

From: The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 19:31:09 +0800
To: Peter Trei <trei@process.com>
Subject: Re: RSA's position on espionage-enabled crypto.
In-Reply-To: <199610032013.NAA23928@toad.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.94.961004015948.647A-100000@random.sp.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 3 Oct 1996, Peter Trei wrote:

> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 16:14:34 -6
> From: Peter Trei <trei@process.com>
> To: cypherpunks@toad.com
> Subject: RSA's position on espionage-enabled crypto.
> 
> RSA has put up a 'position statement' on clipper 4 at their home
> page at www.rsa.com. 
> 
> They're  not rejecting it, but are clearly not wildly pro-GAK either. It's
> clearly early days yet.
> 

Hrmm.. when I read and forwarded it to the list (about 10 minutes ago
now), it seemed to be a "we think its a good thing" type of statement...

 --Deviant
Art is a lie which makes us realize the truth.
                -- Picasso







Thread