1996-10-13 - Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI (was Re: Why not PGP?)

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: azur@netcom.com (Steve Schear)
Message Hash: cb0da6f695fbb247bb9b669ab801d9565fb0156daf3ca785e4241bb98f970737
Message ID: <199610131759.MAA22134@homeport.org>
Reply To: <v02130503ae865897f409@[10.0.2.15]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-13 16:53:52 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 13 Oct 1996 09:53:52 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 1996 09:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
To: azur@netcom.com (Steve Schear)
Subject: Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI (was Re: Why not PGP?)
In-Reply-To: <v02130503ae865897f409@[10.0.2.15]>
Message-ID: <199610131759.MAA22134@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Steve Schear wrote:

| I've been charged with developing an Internet service which needs to assure
| its clients of anonymity.  However, we fear some clients may abuse the
| service and we wish to prevent the abusers from re-enrollment if
| terminated for misbehavior. (In your example, it would be the person(s)
| trying to discover the service host via flood).

	Why not have a high sign up fee or deposit?  Let people play
games, and pay for it.  Trying to build morality into a crypto system
is tough.  Its easier to move the costs up front. Let those who
want to pay the deposit fee repeatedly do so.  Think of it as a tax
refund. :)

Adam


-- 
"Every year the Republicans campaign like Libertarians, and then go to
Wasthington and spend like Democrats."

Vote Harry Browne for President.  http://www.harrybrowne96.org








Thread