1996-10-05 - Re: How to fight GAK by obeying the law

Header Data

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
To: “Ernest Hua” <m5@tivoli.com>
Message Hash: d42f07a662ab11f0448857d3e770cddafd01b45140fa9243283d0cc041fee572
Message ID: <19961005070015328.AAA64@GIGANTE>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-05 09:53:30 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 17:53:30 +0800

Raw message

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 17:53:30 +0800
To: "Ernest Hua" <m5@tivoli.com>
Subject: Re: How to fight GAK by obeying the law
Message-ID: <19961005070015328.AAA64@GIGANTE>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Fri, 04 Oct 1996 08:02:04 -0500, Mike McNally wrote:

>> First thing we definitely need is a way to determine with fairly good
>> accuracy, whether a host is in the U.S.

>I really don't see how that's possible, given the possibility of me
>taking my laptop to Ecuador, dialing into a stateside ISP, and being
>issued an IP address in the ISP's domain.  In other words, anything
>that bases a decision on host location by inference on the domain 
>will inherently be rooted in the notion that hosts in that domain are
>stuck to the ground "nearby".

Maybe have the option of identifying host mobility?

#  Chris Adams <adamsc@io-online.com>   | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
#  <cadams@acucobol.com>		 | send mail with subject "send PGPKEY"
"That's our advantage at Microsoft; we set the standards and we can change them."
   --- Karen Hargrove, Microsoft (quoted in the Feb 1993 Unix Review editorial)







Thread