1996-10-06 - Re: RSA’s Official Permission

Header Data

From: The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
To: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Message Hash: d5e4eef4cc101f4c8ff22fabd08bb865b23af3cbdd533b2dba513cec4c31f426
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.94.961006174647.569A-100000@random.sp.org>
Reply To: <199610060521.WAA10181@dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-06 19:44:24 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 7 Oct 1996 03:44:24 +0800

Raw message

From: The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 1996 03:44:24 +0800
To: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: RSA's Official Permission
In-Reply-To: <199610060521.WAA10181@dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.94.961006174647.569A-100000@random.sp.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sat, 5 Oct 1996, Bill Stewart wrote:

> >   REDWOOD CITY, Calif.---Oct. 2nd, 1996--RSA Data Security, Inc., a
> >   wholly-owned subsidiary of Security Dynamics Technologies, Inc.
> >   (NASDAQ: SDTI), issued the following comments on the administration's
> >   recent announcement of a Key Recovery Initiative:
>         [rave reviews deleted....]
> 
> I wonder how much being bought by SDT has influenced their positions?
> 

presumably a very large amount, I seriously doubt if R, S, and A like
supporting GAK.

 --Deviant
Talking much about oneself can also be a means to conceal oneself.
		-- Friedrich Nietzsche







Thread