1996-10-08 - Re: encrypting pppd?
Header Data
From: VaX#n8 <vax@linkdead.paranoia.com>
To: “Chris Adams” <adamsc@io-online.com>
Message Hash: d808f8236d5bf3eafe512a809fd70fceab706f7439ae9963d2108d83e06868c3
Message ID: <199610081334.IAA03596@linkdead.paranoia.com>
Reply To: <19961007204519812.AAA220@GIGANTE>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-08 19:10:19 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 9 Oct 1996 03:10:19 +0800
Raw message
From: VaX#n8 <vax@linkdead.paranoia.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 1996 03:10:19 +0800
To: "Chris Adams" <adamsc@io-online.com>
Subject: Re: encrypting pppd?
In-Reply-To: <19961007204519812.AAA220@GIGANTE>
Message-ID: <199610081334.IAA03596@linkdead.paranoia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In message <19961007204519812.AAA220@GIGANTE>, Adamsc writes:
>>If you encrypt the entire link level properly then ...
>What about predictabilities in the PPP datastream?
They exist.
Thread
Return to October 1996
- Return to “Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)”
Return to “VaX#n8 <vax@linkdead.paranoia.com>”
- 1996-10-08 (Tue, 8 Oct 1996 09:53:39 +0800) - Re: encrypting pppd? - Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
- 1996-10-08 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 03:10:19 +0800) - Re: encrypting pppd? - VaX#n8 <vax@linkdead.paranoia.com>