1996-10-03 - Re: How might new GAK be enforced?

Header Data

From: “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: d9dd56d24f4d25908da539b6e7399473c8a419a44a5c1e4f00c64325b0cb21e0
Message ID: <199610011603.MAA27024@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
Reply To: <199610012106.RAA11318@redwood.skiles.gatech.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-03 02:46:29 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 10:46:29 +0800

Raw message

From: "Peter D. Junger" <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 10:46:29 +0800
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: How might new GAK be enforced?
In-Reply-To: <199610012106.RAA11318@redwood.skiles.gatech.edu>
Message-ID: <199610011603.MAA27024@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Richard Coleman writes:

: I've always wondered why large companies just don't write some type of
: standards document for crypto to interoperate, and then have each
: foreign branch write (or contract out) their own version.  I don't see how
: this violates export laws in any way.

The definition of ``software'' in the ITAR includes ``algortihms'' and
``logic flow'', so I suspect that the ODTC wouuld claim that the
standards are software that cannot be ``exported'' without a licnese.

--
Peter D. Junger--Case Western Reserve University Law School--Cleveland, OH
Internet:  junger@pdj2-ra.f-remote.cwru.edu    junger@samsara.law.cwru.edu
                     URL:  http://samsara.law.cwru.edu

Thread

• Return to October 1996

• Return to “Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>”
• Return to “Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>”
• Return to “Omegaman <omegaman@bigeasy.com>”
• Return to “Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>”
• Return to ““Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>”
• Return to “Richard Coleman <coleman@math.gatech.edu>”

• Return to ““Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>”

• 1996-10-01 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 05:52:07 +0800) - How might new GAK be enforced? - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1996-10-01 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 07:44:31 +0800) - Re: How might new GAK be enforced? - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
    • 1996-10-03 (Thu, 3 Oct 1996 10:31:59 +0800) - Re: How might new GAK be enforced? - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>
  • 1996-10-02 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 09:38:23 +0800) - Re: How might new GAK be enforced? - Richard Coleman <coleman@math.gatech.edu>
    • 1996-10-03 (Thu, 3 Oct 1996 10:46:29 +0800) - Re: How might new GAK be enforced? - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
      • 1996-10-03 (Thu, 3 Oct 1996 11:45:21 +0800) - Re: How might new GAK be enforced? - Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
  • 1996-10-02 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 11:31:45 +0800) - Re: How might new GAK be enforced? - Omegaman <omegaman@bigeasy.com>