1996-10-03 - Re: encrypting pppd?

Header Data

From: roy@sendai.scytale.com (Roy M. Silvernail)
To: vax@linkdead.paranoia.com (VaX#n8)
Message Hash: e3aa09768f709cbfe99128b6a0f580b1a7ac91344a47977c1c96ad5cc18a5437
Message ID: <961002.235706.1R8.rnr.w165w@sendai.scytale.com>
Reply To: <199610021431.JAA02934@linkdead.paranoia.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-03 11:05:50 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 19:05:50 +0800

Raw message

From: roy@sendai.scytale.com (Roy M. Silvernail)
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 19:05:50 +0800
To: vax@linkdead.paranoia.com (VaX#n8)
Subject: Re: encrypting pppd?
In-Reply-To: <199610021431.JAA02934@linkdead.paranoia.com>
Message-ID: <961002.235706.1R8.rnr.w165w@sendai.scytale.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In list.cypherpunks, vax@linkdead.paranoia.com writes:

> Anyone worked on, or know of a freely available, one of these beasts?

What threat model does this address?  It'd be link encryption, where the
best security is found in end-to-end encryption.
- -- 
           Roy M. Silvernail     [ ]      roy@scytale.com
DNRC Minister Plenipotentiary of All Things Confusing, Software Division
PGP Public Key fingerprint =  31 86 EC B9 DB 76 A7 54  13 0B 6A 6B CC 09 18 B6
                Key available from pubkey@scytale.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMlNH/xvikii9febJAQHpGwP+Kas52dEW1v7+rGNvpsOEhHhPFT03l41k
EMhqHd9ULlSS5glNMoadPkhX6uAg7I0TEZSl1uNt3wdNp1EMQg63k3Qlxmu9OT0Q
RBKLXE+PIknWP9MXF73EI8RtEeqI+OsOfzXVNthXThlc+fKAtRc3eaBb0W6w/bpK
xV0PoUEBm74=
=T2Gb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread