From: “Omegaman” <omega@bigeasy.com>
To: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Message Hash: f3b054d17d0ef522abddf532eeff3f1119e727de4ce251d4f17e50e716344487
Message ID: <199610021251.HAA14601@bigeasy.bigeasy.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-02 16:32:48 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 00:32:48 +0800
From: "Omegaman" <omega@bigeasy.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 00:32:48 +0800
To: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Clipper III on the table
Message-ID: <199610021251.HAA14601@bigeasy.bigeasy.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Allow me to say here that I do not belive that Netscape will be amongst
> those fooled so easily. But IBM, HP, TIS, and others have already been
> fooled. The USG does not need to get every software company to agree with
> their proposal. Divide and conquer. Seems that the USG has done a
> marvelous job of D&C so far.
>
If anything, it would not be in their best _marketing_ interests to
support GAK. Rejecting GAK in favor of promoting strong crypto will
make them look like "good guys".
This is also true of Micro$oft. And contrary to an earlier opinion,
I think Bill & Co. have been soured by their experiences with DoJ.
While their are far larger motivations involve, I certainly don't
think Micro$oft will skip at the chance to thumb their noses at the
government if it's to their advantage.
Both of these companies may be willing to support a DES-crack effort
me
--------------------------------------------------------------
Omegaman <mailto:omega@bigeasy.com>
PGP Key fingerprint = 6D 31 C3 00 77 8C D1 C2
59 0A 01 E3 AF 81 94 63
Send a message with the text "get key" in the
"Subject:" field to get a copy of my public key.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Return to October 1996
Return to ““Omegaman” <omega@bigeasy.com>”
1996-10-02 (Thu, 3 Oct 1996 00:32:48 +0800) - Re: Clipper III on the table - “Omegaman” <omega@bigeasy.com>