1996-10-28 - Re: considering internet/privacy periodical

Header Data

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
To: “gbroiles@netbox.com>
Message Hash: f4817bb6189abd97551268051d41e4d03052fd6ff6fc8ea895a2f9e416d2d81f
Message ID: <19961028063026703.AAA210@io-online.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-28 06:31:57 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 27 Oct 1996 22:31:57 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 1996 22:31:57 -0800 (PST)
To: "gbroiles@netbox.com>
Subject: Re: considering internet/privacy periodical
Message-ID: <19961028063026703.AAA210@io-online.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 27 Oct 1996 16:36:14 -0800, Greg Broiles wrote:


>I'm considering putting together a periodic publication about the technical
>and legal aspects of privacy and the Internet. My "business model" would
>feature free WWW/email access with a charge for fax or postal delivery. I'm
>curious to know if this strikes people as interesting or just Yet Another
>Email Newsletter Of No Real Consequence. (no offense taken if it's the
>latter.)

If you did a real noise-removal job, this could be very useful.  Sort of a
privacy-RISKs digest, if you will.

#  Chris Adams <adamsc@io-online.com>   | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
#  <cadams@acucobol.com>		 | send mail with subject "send PGPKEY"
"That's our advantage at Microsoft; we set the standards and we can change them."
   --- Karen Hargrove, Microsoft (quoted in the Feb 1993 Unix Review editorial)







Thread