1996-10-16 - Re: Majordomo w/ built-in security

Header Data

From: “John A. Perry” <perry@alpha.jpunix.com>
To: Christopher Durfy <chris@alphawave.com>
Message Hash: fa37e04f1403380a40464db348625f8f3cc207081f8d63b79f6530065de08054
Message ID: <Pine.NEB.3.93.961016054401.5621A-100000@alpha.jpunix.com>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.93.961015172038.21026C-100000@bigkahuna.alphawave.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-16 10:46:42 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 16 Oct 1996 03:46:42 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: "John A. Perry" <perry@alpha.jpunix.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 1996 03:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
To: Christopher Durfy <chris@alphawave.com>
Subject: Re: Majordomo w/ built-in security
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.93.961015172038.21026C-100000@bigkahuna.alphawave.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.93.961016054401.5621A-100000@alpha.jpunix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 15 Oct 1996, Christopher Durfy wrote:

> Hi guys, I'm new to the list, and it looks like a good one ;)
> 
> I've got a question, and was hoping someone could point me in the right
> direction. Here's the situation:
> 
> Would the best way to get somehow incorporate PGP into the majordomo or
> smartlist (if it's possible) and either assign keys to all the doctors
> (or one key for ALL the doctors maybe, to cut on admin times....)
> 
> Anyone ever run up against a situation like this? Any pointers, horror
> stories or solutions are very welcome! 

It's being done right now. I run the mailing list cypher-list. It is
majordomo fully integrated with PGP. All submissions are keyed to the
recipient and all administrative traffic is encrypted in both directions.
For more information, check out my Web Page.

 John Perry KG5RG perry@alpha.jpunix.com PGP-encrypted e-mail welcome!
 WWW - http://www.jpunix.com
 PGP 2.62 key for perry@jpunix.com is on the keyservers.






Thread