From: attila <attila@primenet.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 11:48:20 -0800 (PST)
To: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
Subject: Re: killfiling aga@dhp.com
In-Reply-To: <3.0b28.32.19961121105128.006fd704@ricochet.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.961121193908.7460D-100000@usr09.primenet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 21 Nov 1996, Greg Broiles wrote:

> At 06:45 AM 11/21/96 -0800, nobody@cypherpunks.ca (John Anonymous
> MacDonald) wrote:
> [discussing aga@dhp.com]
> >I should'a kill-filed this sicko long ago.
> 
> Agreed. But if you (and other anonymous posters) are going to continue to
> reply to him or other unproductive kooks, would you please put their
> addresses somewhere in the headers of your messages (perhaps in the To: or
> Cc: or Subject:) headers so that the rest of us who are using killfiles
> won't have to read your replies? 
> 
	all the remailers I know strip the headers except the subject. 

	If you put another header type line in the body of the text, it
    will still be there --in the body which means your filter does a great
    number of CPU cylces unnecessary.  Suggest: 

	    Subject: [aga@] whatever the current smoke....

    which should pass most of the garden variety remailers. 

	Personally, I think he's so far out, he is almost more humouress
    than he is ignorant, but he's been procmailed....

__________________________________________________________________________
    go not unto usenet for advice, for the inhabitants thereof will say:
      yes, and no, and maybe, and I don't know, and fuck-off.