1996-11-18 - Re: The Utility of Privacy Re: The Utility of Privacy
Header Data
From: nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 12a4aaf4a032966ae9c7308a1d27c79cc492b900b4c8d3809aa61528b5f20768
Message ID: <199611180438.UAA15117@mailmasher.com>
Reply To: <199611170222.SAA10990@mailmasher.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-18 09:03:15 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 01:03:15 -0800 (PST)
Raw message
From: nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 01:03:15 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: The Utility of Privacy Re: The Utility of Privacy
In-Reply-To: <199611170222.SAA10990@mailmasher.com>
Message-ID: <199611180438.UAA15117@mailmasher.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Before we complete your school assignment for you how about letting us
all know the due date and the credit value first.
On Sat, 16 Nov 1996, Huge Cajones Remailer wrote:
> Privacy is a hassle. Is it worth it?
>
> Which unfortunate situations does privacy prevent? What are the odds
> that they will occur? How much effort will it take to prevent these
> outcomes? As a model, use the present and future situation of a
> typical reader of this list.
Thread
Return to November 1996
- Return to “Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>”
Return to “nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)”
- 1996-11-17 (Sat, 16 Nov 1996 18:22:42 -0800 (PST)) - The Utility of Privacy - nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
- 1996-11-17 (Sun, 17 Nov 1996 01:12:58 -0800 (PST)) - Re: The Utility of Privacy - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
- 1996-11-18 (Mon, 18 Nov 1996 01:03:15 -0800 (PST)) - Re: The Utility of Privacy Re: The Utility of Privacy - nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)