From: Raph Levien <raph@cs.berkeley.edu>
To: Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
Message Hash: 1518edb08a3212a3368723e79d7481e8b2ba8981fcc6d9d5bc2c9def28800eed
Message ID: <328901CF.6BABEF80@cs.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <199611121348.OAA12869@internal-mail.systemics.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-12 23:02:09 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 15:02:09 -0800 (PST)
From: Raph Levien <raph@cs.berkeley.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 15:02:09 -0800 (PST)
To: Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
Subject: Re: pgp3
In-Reply-To: <199611121348.OAA12869@internal-mail.systemics.com>
Message-ID: <328901CF.6BABEF80@cs.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Gary Howland wrote:
>
> > Someone suggested to me that Derek posted a draft spec for PGP 3.0.
> > Anyone know of the whereabouts of this document.
>
> Yes. That document has evolved to RFC 1991:
>
> 1991 I D. Atkins, W. Stallings, P. Zimmermann, "PGP Message Exchange
> Formats", 08/16/1996. (Pages=21) (Format=.txt)
Nope. This RFC is merely a rehash of the pgformat.doc file in the PGP
2.6.? distribution. I'm doing an independent implementation of the PGP
2.6 message formats, and found this document unclear in a few spots. For
example, can anyone else figure out the weird CFB variant mode from this
document? I used a debugger on the PGP code to help me figure it out.
The PGP 3.0 "spec" that you're referring to is actually a draft for a
PGP library API. A couple of those got circulated on some PGP mailing
lists, but none have been publicly released, another example of the
secrecy surrounding the whole PGP effort.
Now that PGP Inc. is happening, it's not exactly clear whether the PGP
3.0 release is going to include an API closely resembling these drafts.
Hope this helps.
Raph
Return to November 1996
Return to “Raph Levien <raph@cs.berkeley.edu>”