From: Richard Charles Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 15be30af1211a137a0cbaafb8564d6b88d11b780f4e2f2fe00e42ae0cf2643d9
Message ID: <199611140916.BAA24474@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-14 09:16:38 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 01:16:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Richard Charles Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 01:16:38 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: [REBUTTAL] Censorship on cypherpunks?, from The Netly News
Message-ID: <199611140916.BAA24474@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
hyperlex@hol.gr ("George A. Stathis") wrote:
>
>>> Mr. Gilmore, and other like minded parties, might want to consider
>>> what would happen if one parent company owned *all* communications
>>> media. Would they they be so supportive of the ideology of ownership
>>> and communciation they espouse?
>>
>>And just how plausible do you think this is? I believe it is next to
>>impossible, unless it is the result of government regulation.
>
>Man you're nutts. There are very few and quite vast Media Companies
>in the world, and they're on the verge of becoming monopolies.
>
>Even your American President is in reality a puppet of the Trilateral
>Commission, who effectively also control CNN, the Washington Post,
>and many many many other things all over the world.
You're so naive. The Trilateral Commission is just a puppet of General
Electric, the British Royal Family, the Illuminati, the Council on Foreign
Relations, the Elders of Zion, the Knights Templar, the Military-
Industrial Complex, the Communists, the Secret Government, Dead White
Males, the Freemasons, the CIA, Scientology, and my Aunt Marge.
-rich
special agent, zog northwest
i do not speak for the world affairs council
Return to November 1996
Return to “Richard Charles Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>”