From: Paul Foley <mycroft@actrix.gen.nz>
To: rcgraves@ix.netcom.com
Message Hash: 1d875c12082fca870889d6d049066a4349f8a63e8c570a0d7728dee7afe63c91
Message ID: <199611080315.QAA17329@mycroft.actrix.gen.nz>
Reply To: <199611072025.PAA22083@spirit.hks.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-08 05:15:56 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 21:15:56 -0800 (PST)
From: Paul Foley <mycroft@actrix.gen.nz>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 21:15:56 -0800 (PST)
To: rcgraves@ix.netcom.com
Subject: Re: Blocking addresses by default
In-Reply-To: <199611072025.PAA22083@spirit.hks.net>
Message-ID: <199611080315.QAA17329@mycroft.actrix.gen.nz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Thu, 7 Nov 1996 15:25:07 -0500, Rich Graves wrote:
remailer@nowhere.com looks for "$$" as the first line of the message,
and strips everything up to the next occurrence of "$$". It then appends
its own disclaimer block before sending the message to the hop (remailer
or final destination).
A bit annoying, yes, but I think this would go a long way towards
improving public relations. I don't see how it compromises security.
Neither do I. I think it should use something like a line of dashes,
or maybe a C comment, though, rather than $$, to make it look
'prettier' for the eventual recipient, and clarify that it's not part
of the original message.
What's wrong with this scheme? Other than the fact that all remailers
would have to change their software at the exact same moment. :-)
This is not true, of course. Implement it in two stages. First
recognise and strip the disclaimer, but don't prepend one, then, when
all remailers are doing this, start prepending information.
--
Paul Foley <mycroft@actrix.gen.nz> --- PGPmail preferred
PGP key ID 0x1CA3386D available from keyservers
fingerprint = 4A 76 83 D8 99 BC ED 33 C5 02 81 C9 BF 7A 91 E8
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I must have slipped a disk -- my pack hurts
Return to November 1996
Return to “Rich Graves <rcgraves@ix.netcom.com>”