From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1fb67830c3a33e23d89a37ccf9aa4b9560d64c92325a0d2444b0a71dc3bfd261
Message ID: <3.0b36.32.19961105070826.0070f470@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-05 12:07:25 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 5 Nov 1996 04:07:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 1996 04:07:25 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: IRS Subscribed to Cypherpunks
Message-ID: <3.0b36.32.19961105070826.0070f470@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Got the following bounce. The Cc: was to a real address.
DCF
>Date: Tue, 5 Nov 1996 05:24:21 -0500
>From: Administrator@ccmail.irs.gov (Administrator)
>Subject: Message not deliverable
>To: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
>Cc: XXXXXXXXX (Administrator)
>Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
>
>At 04:45 AM 11/4/96 -0800, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>>Libertarianism is not incompatible with strict regulations, as long as
>>the rules violate nobody's rights.
>>
>>-Declan
>
>Obviously many voluntary religious organizations have quite strict rules
>for their members and are compatible with libertarianism. Government
>monopoly regulations that cannot be opted out of are not compatible with
>libertarianism. Instead of using the loaded term "regulations' it might be
>better to call things like the rules of the cypherpunk's list "club rules"
>or protocols.
>
>DCF
>
>
Return to November 1996
Return to “Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>”