From: “Dana W. Albrecht” <dwa@corsair.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2cfc319b1b6a5586d7ec5a9760a19fa6cef24e6f586534f37040f13d10e95e78
Message ID: <199611191733.JAA19742@vishnu.corsair.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-19 17:32:57 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1996 09:32:57 -0800 (PST)
From: "Dana W. Albrecht" <dwa@corsair.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1996 09:32:57 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Taking out the garbage
Message-ID: <199611191733.JAA19742@vishnu.corsair.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I'd like to point out that accepting posts from those who are not
technically subscribed to the list is not always a bad idea. In particular,
many of us read the list through means other than a direct subscription,
be it either a mail-to-news gateway, web server, filtered list, or other
such mechanism.
As a case in point, while I do read the list, my actual email address is not
subscribed to it. :)
While I usually don't contribute to the discussion, I hope that the few
posts I have made from time to time don't fall into the pollution category.
Furthermore, it's often the case that noted cryptographers who are not
subscribed to the list occasionally post valuable contributions to it (e.g.
Matt Blaze).
Non-subscription and pollution are not necessarily related.
Dana W. Albrecht
dwa@corsair.com
Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com> writes:
> Beginning Monday, 11/25/96, I will bounce all email from the various
> (non-)subscribers polluting this list with garbage back to the
> authors. Furthermore, I will attach documents describing basic
> Internet rules of conduct to each bounce.
>
> I would encourage other Cypherpunks to do the same.
Return to November 1996
Return to “Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>”