From: "Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 18:45:49 -0800 (PST)
To: inglem@adnetsol.com>
Subject: Re: Black markets vs. cryptoanarchy
In-Reply-To: <199611100747.XAA00328@cryptical.adnetsol.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961110214102.1690A-100000@gak.voicenet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Sat, 9 Nov 1996, Mike Ingle wrote:

> A theoretical discovery is needed particularly in the area of recipient
> anonymity. Good sender anonymity and weak recipient anonymity leads to
> 'hit and run' behavior such as spamming email and newsgroups, but not
> to anonymous markets.

The current nymservers offer pretty good security.  The only problem is they
are vulnerable to traffic analysis.  If an attacker wants to find out whether
a particular person is using a pseudonym, he could send a lot of messages to
the nym and if the suspected user receives that same amount of messages in
anonymously remailed traffic.  This would confirm the attacker's suspicion.
There are a few ways to protect against this.  One way is for a person to
request that email stored on the nym server be delivered.  The email could be
delivered as one large encrypted message.  The user could also request each
email individually, but this does have some drawbacks.  Delivering each message
as it is received is a Bad Thing.

Mark
- -- 
finger -l for PGP key
PGP encrypted mail prefered.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBMoaT0yzIPc7jvyFpAQFJWQf9FiQUfKlgs0oI1rLx6qFB7tbxkNkMnzsx
fGG4QDh8XxokWF6eJW5550mlC/kpZF81/QUHQMkbQqpqWud8Pvzxo1dBxRkhcKsC
xnI44ICR2t4xDww0DOt5P3XG0FbBoQUYfeJkD3Mjw1ZNq838hSJrZjF+06sB2y7V
fMd5JXJtqLWsHMvlXYpu1oHr0K4aB+iddBIERZjyDLDsXf4ejuQapio7OO1fSE1n
Rk1cR+zHIh5iWLMYyHzFXMyLCOVE1PhwndOfiUlwIlI59ISu40Anl+qJ+7I7rEQu
i3BJipswUOZ47V1c0Ek/DixI1F5rV6NFxd4zJlYRYB3KvcOrNwWThg==
=WWzM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----