From: Sean Roach <roach_s@alph.swosu.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3b156c02727fae454a8573341602bcbfab868179e802dac50e2b295ffbd2abc7
Message ID: <199611141540.HAA05682@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-14 15:42:14 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 07:42:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Sean Roach <roach_s@alph.swosu.edu>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 07:42:14 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: RE: Remailer Abuse Solutions
Message-ID: <199611141540.HAA05682@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 01:32 PM 11/13/96 -0800, Lucky Green wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, Peter Hendrickson wrote:
>
>> At 10:34 AM 11/13/1996, Mullen Patrick wrote:
>> > Also,
>> > what happens when your long-lost friend comes across your addy and tries to
>> > email you? Surely you don't want to charge postage for an otherwise free
>> > service to him/er. Maintaining a list of "accepted sources" would be a
hassle
>> > not many people would accept.
>>
>> Absent highly intrusive global net monitoring techniques, that's what they
>> are going to have to do anyway. E-mail is inexpensive. The advertiser
>> can justify the expense even if generates a small number of leads. Expect
>> more spam.
>
>There is a very simple way of dealing with your long lost friend. And any
>other person not on your "free" list. If you find their email worth your
>while, you can always give them their money back. For future contact, you
>can move your friend on the "free" list.
>
>Frankly, I don't think there is anybody new that I care to communicate with
>who wouln't be willing to make a small deposit for initiating communications.
>
>-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred
> Member JPFO. "America's Aggressive Civil Rights Organization"
You might want to consider making that a price on message size, otherwise
I'll just send you the contents of the Sears catalog, the Damark catalog,
the full collection of the clearing house sweepstakes, and an Amway catalog
at one low price. (My backers could get in on a great cut, at $1.00 a
message they would each pay $.25)
I would say $.50 per Kilobyte, including attachments.
Return to November 1996
Return to “Sean Roach <roach_s@alph.swosu.edu>”
1996-11-14 (Thu, 14 Nov 1996 07:42:14 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Remailer Abuse Solutions - Sean Roach <roach_s@alph.swosu.edu>