From: “Mullen Patrick” <Mullen.Patrick@mail.ndhm.gtegsc.com>
To: “Cypherpunks” <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 45b76051947b5892a15b01007e3299dad2f81e4bd251960458b845a2896b7457
Message ID: <n1363459702.71040@mail.ndhm.gtegsc.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-22 16:34:59 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 08:34:59 -0800 (PST)
From: "Mullen Patrick" <Mullen.Patrick@mail.ndhm.gtegsc.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 08:34:59 -0800 (PST)
To: "Cypherpunks" <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: RE: Mass-market crypto phones
Message-ID: <n1363459702.71040@mail.ndhm.gtegsc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
_______________________________________________________________________________
From: Adam Shostack on Fri, Nov 22, 1996 1:21
>
> I'd just like to second what Lucky wrote at the end of his
>very nice summation of the crypto phone hardware issues. Eric's phones
>have damn good voice quality in secure mode.
I should probably make it more clear that my comment referred to price, NOT
quality. I'm sure it is a wonderful product (I haven't tried it myself),
but I believe the price tag was at or around $1000. My comments on the
hardware used was for demostration purposes, not for saying anything was
wrong with the design strategy. In fact, I thought it was a perfectly fine
strategy, and easy(ish) to implement. Basically, it took the dedicated
computer you would need for phone encryption and put it in a cheaper box.
To be honest, I thought he had a good idea. I just wouldn't want to pay
$1000 for phone encryption. But, it's rare I have conversations where I
need that much security. I'm sure the product is worth it; it's just out
of my price range. And probably out of the price range of the average user.
PM
USER ERROR: REPLACE AND STRIKE ANY KEY WHEN READY
Return to November 1996
Return to ““Mullen Patrick” <Mullen.Patrick@mail.ndhm.gtegsc.com>”