From: SUCRUM22at_INDY-ADP@smtp-gw.cv62.navy.mil
To: Paul Foley <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 45ddc2f62b95faa916375835292b762074de40470239e1ce484351a2fe80d740
Message ID: <9610118477.AA847730399@smtp-gw.cv62.navy.mil>
Reply To: _N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-10 23:42:08 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 15:42:08 -0800 (PST)
From: SUCRUM22_at_INDY-ADP@smtp-gw.cv62.navy.mil
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 15:42:08 -0800 (PST)
To: Paul Foley <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re[2]: a retort + a comment + a question = [RANT]
Message-ID: <9610118477.AA847730399@smtp-gw.cv62.navy.mil>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Foley <mycroft@actrix.gen.nz> wrote at the end
of an enlightening message:
>(BTW, does your address @smtp-gw.cv62.navy.mil imply
>that that you're actually aboard the Independence?)
yes it does. questions/comments can be directed via e-mail to my
address as i am already _almost_ off-topic. remember people, i'm
playing devil's advocate here. so far, while nothing has really
changed my thinking process outright, comments are surely making
me think more (assuming that that's the point).
---------------------- SUCRUM22@cv62.navy.mil -----------------------
a calculated risk based on the possible consequence of an action
is better than a haphazard one based on poor judgment or ignorance
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't confuse my views with those of the DoD or the United States Navy
Return to November 1996
Return to “SUCRUM22_at_INDY-ADP@smtp-gw.cv62.navy.mil”
1996-11-10 (Sun, 10 Nov 1996 15:42:08 -0800 (PST)) - Re[2]: a retort + a comment + a question = [RANT] - SUCRUM22_at_INDY-ADP@smtp-gw.cv62.navy.mil