1996-11-10 - Re[2]: a retort + a comment + a question = [RANT]

Header Data

From: SUCRUM22at_INDY-ADP@smtp-gw.cv62.navy.mil
To: Paul Foley <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 45ddc2f62b95faa916375835292b762074de40470239e1ce484351a2fe80d740
Message ID: <9610118477.AA847730399@smtp-gw.cv62.navy.mil>
Reply To: _N/A

UTC Datetime: 1996-11-10 23:42:08 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 15:42:08 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: SUCRUM22_at_INDY-ADP@smtp-gw.cv62.navy.mil
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 15:42:08 -0800 (PST)
To: Paul Foley <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re[2]: a retort + a comment + a question = [RANT]
Message-ID: <9610118477.AA847730399@smtp-gw.cv62.navy.mil>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


     ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
     Paul Foley <mycroft@actrix.gen.nz> wrote at the end 
     of an enlightening message:
     >(BTW, does your address @smtp-gw.cv62.navy.mil imply 
     >that that you're actually aboard the Independence?)
     
     yes it does.  questions/comments can be directed via e-mail to my
     address as i am already _almost_ off-topic.  remember people, i'm
     playing devil's advocate here.  so far, while nothing has really
     changed my thinking process outright, comments are surely making 
     me think more (assuming that that's the point).
     
     ---------------------- SUCRUM22@cv62.navy.mil -----------------------
       a calculated risk based on the possible consequence of an action
      is better than a haphazard one based on poor judgment or ignorance
     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
     Don't confuse my views with those of the DoD or the United States Navy
     
     
     
     
     





Thread