1996-11-04 - Re: Censorship on cypherpunks

Header Data

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
To: “wfrench@interport.net>
Message Hash: 467e950c5304834d6abdc2b5daf8a4a1b11ea664b25d6103fb3aa267a07163df
Message ID: <19961104044209687.AAA199@localhost>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-04 04:43:57 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Nov 1996 20:43:57 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 1996 20:43:57 -0800 (PST)
To: "wfrench@interport.net>
Subject: Re: Censorship on cypherpunks
Message-ID: <19961104044209687.AAA199@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 3 Nov 1996 18:54:16 -0500 (EST), Will French wrote:

>  Except it's not very effective, is it, since he's still
>posting flames?  In any case, it's an admission on John
>Gilmore's part that libertarianism can't work without some
>measure of authoritarianism; the only argument is over _just how
>much_ authoritarianism we need.
  
>  I'm quite upset about this.  Up to now I was able to tell
>people that "there is at least one mailing list on the net that
>functions in a completely open manner".  No more.

This has been taken far too seriously.  Cypherpunks is a *PRIVATE* list. 
There is no obligation to accept anyone.

#  Chris Adams <adamsc@io-online.com>   | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
#  <cadams@acucobol.com>		 | send mail with subject "send PGPKEY"
"That's our advantage at Microsoft; we set the standards and we can change them."
   --- Karen Hargrove, Microsoft (quoted in the Feb 1993 Unix Review editorial)







Thread