1996-11-19 - Re: Securing Electronic Mail Within HMG

Header Data

From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: ben@algroup.co.uk
Message Hash: 48121f154a76982dee85c6ce2c34d37e061acd196bc3b52ca510a1b9ee277141
Message ID: <1.5.4.32.19961119134957.006a19d4@pop.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-19 13:52:24 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1996 05:52:24 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1996 05:52:24 -0800 (PST)
To: ben@algroup.co.uk
Subject: Re: Securing Electronic Mail Within HMG
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19961119134957.006a19d4@pop.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Ben Laurie wrote:

>This document is available on the Web, at:
>
>http://www.xopen.org/public/tech/security/pki/casm/casm.htm
>
>see also my "addendum" to Anderson & Roe's paper (which is actually a critique
>of the above proposal, rather than RH itself) at:
>
>http://www.algroup.co.uk/crypto/rh.html


Ben rightly points to a complete and handsome forebear of our 
gap-toothed descendant. We withdraw ours.

Thanks Ben. And thanks for your "addendum" to A&R.









Thread