1996-11-10 - Re: Black Unicorn exposed?

Header Data

From: ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)
To: Robert Hettinga <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 535d9a8d2f711530675e8d87bfb6e43106555bdde770f9587c4acafbba2435a8
Message ID: <v02140b00aeab9f25f781@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-10 15:42:34 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 07:42:34 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 07:42:34 -0800 (PST)
To: Robert Hettinga <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Black Unicorn exposed?
Message-ID: <v02140b00aeab9f25f781@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 8:30 PM 11/9/1996, Robert Hettinga wrote:
>At 12:45 pm -0500 11/9/96, Peter Hendrickson wrote:
>> We are hardly operating in a hostile environment.  Yet, somebody
>> who has apparently gone to some effort to have an anonymous
>> identity has been exposed.  The implications of this are worth
>> considering.

> Nope. Sorry, Pete. Hope you didn't throw out your sholder, swinging for the
> fences like that. ;-).

Phew!  While this news leaves me looking foolish, I am relieved.

Now for my real question: Does the One True Cypherpunk really have
a black unicorn on his coat of arms?

Peter Hendrickson
ph@netcom.com







Thread