From: “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>
To: “‘jya@pipeline.com>
Message Hash: 59e773fb52231cb982f5641b1760b0bd9b70b22ab12805b2d390bb4785108650
Message ID: <c=US%a=%p=Inference%l=LANDRU-961108172115Z-1414@landru.novato.inference2.com>
Reply To: _N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-08 17:22:20 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 09:22:20 -0800 (PST)
From: "James A. Tunnicliffe" <Tunny@inference.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 09:22:20 -0800 (PST)
To: "'jya@pipeline.com>
Subject: RE: WinKrypt
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=Inference%l=LANDRU-961108172115Z-1414@landru.novato.inference2.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
By way of JYA:
> >"WinKrypt's marriage of highly sophisticated technology -- such
> >as the advanced, not-for- export 256-bit GOST encryption
> >algorithm contained in the KeyMail program -- with a
> >user-friendly interface virtually redefines the PC security
> >category," said Syncronys.
>>
>> http://www.syncronys.com.
ROTFL! Marvelous. This from the folks who brought us SoftRam95,
arguably the most blatant fraud ever perpetuated on the software buying
public. For that, they recently got off with a remarkably soft slap on
the wrist from the FTC. (See
http://ftp.uni-mannheim.de/info/OReilly/windows/win95.update/softram.htm
l for the story.) I wouldn't buy a _screen saver_ from these folks, let
alone a mission critical piece like email encryption!
Tunny
======================================================================
James A. Tunnicliffe | WWWeb: http://www.inference.com/~tunny
Inference Corporation | PGP Fingerprint: CA 23 E2 F3 AC 2D 0C 77
tunny@Inference.com | 36 07 D9 33 3D 32 53 9C
======================================================================
>
Return to November 1996
Return to ““James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>”
1996-11-08 (Fri, 8 Nov 1996 09:22:20 -0800 (PST)) - RE: WinKrypt - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>