From: apteryx@super.zippo.com (Mark Heaney)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5ea4a917b219c29c4638cb78df05fac6beeeaba86cbdde99b89193ec0ff7ac44
Message ID: <3290d021.3724525@super.zippo.com>
Reply To: <v03007803aeb2869761df@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-16 14:41:02 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 16 Nov 1996 06:41:02 -0800 (PST)
From: apteryx@super.zippo.com (Mark Heaney)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 1996 06:41:02 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: A New Crypto Announcement--Could be Ominous
In-Reply-To: <v03007803aeb2869761df@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <3290d021.3724525@super.zippo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, 15 Nov 1996 12:49:55 -0800, you wrote:
[snip]
>----end of item---
>
>It sounds ominous to me. Another backroom deal, probably for some form of
>key recovery strategy, aka GAK.
[snip]
It sure looks like it, the following quotes from CNN's web page:
http://www.cnn.com/TECH/9611/15/encryption.reut/index.html
make it pretty clear that US government-approved export of strong
cryptography is part of the announcement. What else could it be except
gak?
"If the encryption technology has won the backing of industry and the
U.S. and other governments -- which Hewlett-Packard officials say is
the case -- the development could eliminate a key obstacle to the
growth of electronic commerce via the Internet. "
and
"The technology will make it possible to export products containing
so-called "strong encryption," which have not been exportable under
national security laws dating back to the Cold War. "
Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQB1AwUBMo3R9N36bir1/qfZAQFGvgMAv274G+Gqaf5RsKkcofh4LJfDjHioKqVU
bc+TPQZJSqDRnXbEpdkKlRGznN7+LPCKXyq/tsIT5PpNBJdyLDJJ9pzrwpGIHDCK
6Qiwa4qWEeye9Lj2YTvLLyQNXcDYgMLr
=O/qi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to November 1996
Return to ““Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>”