1996-11-13 - Re: Information [for new PGP user]

Header Data

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
To: dthorn@gte.net (Dale Thorn)
Message Hash: 5fccad943d61f784951fd211ce6cad7dfe6c4c284d9102160267c86a019cb2f6
Message ID: <199611131840.MAA01754@smoke.suba.com>
Reply To: <3284BF7A.36E0@gte.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-13 18:24:13 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 10:24:13 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 10:24:13 -0800 (PST)
To: dthorn@gte.net (Dale Thorn)
Subject: Re: Information [for new PGP user]
In-Reply-To: <3284BF7A.36E0@gte.net>
Message-ID: <199611131840.MAA01754@smoke.suba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Paul Bradley wrote:
> > > >I'll bet you can't find 10 out of 1,000 users who have read the total source,
> > > may not function as expected.
> > compile on my system with the borland makefile than comes with PGP.
>Yet another success (NOT!) story for PGP.  I wonder how many people on this list
>would be willing to bet something *really* important to them on the security of PGP?

     I'd have more trouble trusting the Loose Nut on the other end than the
software. 
 
     Security is more than the software, it is picking proper Pass Phrases
(which I am not too sure about), it is keeping the keys where it is less
than easy to get at, it is making sure the machine isn't compromised etc. 

     Also, I ask you once again, Could you please format your email to 
under 80 columns? You might have something valuable to say, but I can't 
stand to read any of your posts more than 2 or 3 lines because of the 
way the lines break. 

     Thank you.


Petro, Christopher C.
petro@suba.com <prefered for any non-list stuff>
snow@smoke.suba.com





Thread