1996-11-04 - Re: Censorship on cypherpunks

Header Data

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: Declan McCullagh <wfrench@interport.net>
Message Hash: 72592ca034217cd006af60a720182344cf38b88aa4564ab887d9f17883d92040
Message ID: <3.0b19.32.19961104164654.007192c4@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-04 21:53:51 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 4 Nov 1996 13:53:51 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 1996 13:53:51 -0800 (PST)
To: Declan McCullagh <wfrench@interport.net>
Subject: Re: Censorship on cypherpunks
Message-ID: <3.0b19.32.19961104164654.007192c4@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 04:45 AM 11/4/96 -0800, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>Libertarianism is not incompatible with strict regulations, as long as 
>the rules violate nobody's rights.
>
>-Declan

Obviously many voluntary religious organizations have quite strict rules
for their members and are compatible with libertarianism.  Government
monopoly regulations that cannot be opted out of are not compatible with
libertarianism.  Instead of using the loaded term "regulations' it might be
better to call things like the rules of the cypherpunk's list "club rules"
or protocols.

DCF





Thread