From: "Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 1996 09:18:04 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal
In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19961116132534.00685bf4@ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961116121708.769B-100000@gak.voicenet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Sat, 16 Nov 1996, Clay Olbon II wrote:

> At 08:06 PM 11/14/96 -0800, you wrote:
> >> 
> >> I'm still mildly curious as to why support for >128 bit keys is not
> >> available in any form I know of.
> >
> >	What do you mean? 3DES ships with Stronghold, and will ship
> >with C2Net's other products as well.
> 
> Yes, but I believe 3DES has an effective key length of only 112 bits.  Of
> course, even this is more than sufficient for a long time to come. 

3DES can have an effective key length of 168 bits if 3 keys are used instead
of two.  There are no security problems that I know of from using 3 keys.

Mark
- -- 
finger -l for PGP key
PGP encrypted mail prefered.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBMo332izIPc7jvyFpAQE8ZggAmtBzP2/B72Q++Ce4Yw2Iz/eBJsPf3kNq
nM6BrUZArHSRgNXp4/g/DLmBrfw1cRO5X1P1sEfNd0OPo/VnjKjNEhqBea/lZlW4
0GwOnXbotHDlthz/t1POiHV2yMy7EvDelVZynuEIoqpE2/6koxJ/DJjD27t++6ka
atGAXbCKgsS68JQOCzZT2r1webXIlqbouKKpSiTFDTTS2jnSiFBa3CE89U7Udbbw
Fvg+sUGicxN2f9PzuE+x1PGJLaHHbqMcz1ObyJWyIljNERpgGrV6LEwIccq/k8hn
2ikFb8EvnIQXtUCtghDztr8nOLWhGUMrO2pFvV4Cr5BeSO1DWXs1qA==
=fVkb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----