1996-11-08 - [off subject]Re: Parents effectively lose their right

Header Data

From: Sean Roach <roach_s@alph.swosu.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 744c1003a0a2383b4d6355063fe33240c756b6dd487c157eac2b1ed59f3a35ff
Message ID: <199611080215.SAA23645@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-08 02:15:52 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 18:15:52 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Sean Roach <roach_s@alph.swosu.edu>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 18:15:52 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: [off subject]Re: Parents effectively lose their right
Message-ID: <199611080215.SAA23645@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 10:03 AM 11/6/96 -0800, Michael Craft wrote:
>> Family Research Council Washington Watch News - October 25, 1996 - Vol.
>> 8:1
>> 
>> "Parents effectively lose their right to direct the upbringing of their
>> children ..., ruled that Katy Independent School District in TX did
>> not violate parents' rights by allowing Child Protective Services to 
>> interrogate a student without notifying his parents, nor by instructing 
>> him to lie to his parents about the incident."
>
>Spanking and ecumenical prayer may be illegal in the schools, but 
>methinks the above is actually more harmful to society than mindless
>prayer or a little paddling.
>
>
Actually, at least in Oklahoma, corporal punishment is still quite legal,
it's just considered risky.  Many parents actually believe that "thier
little angel can do no wrong", incapable of believing that the actions that
thier little hooligans propagated.  It is these parents who might sue, but
that doesn't change the fact that at least in Oklahoma, corporal punishment
can still be used in the schools.






Thread