1996-11-06 - FW: Now we have it all
Header Data
From: “Butler, Scott” <SButler@chemson.com>
To: “‘IMCEAX400-c=GB+3Ba=+20+3Bp=CHEMSON+3Bo=CSH+3Bdda+3ASMTP=CYPHERPUNKS+40TOAD+2ECOM+3B@chemson.com>
Message Hash: 7e6c197cd9a0c66cc9607158a2fab98a47e108908f6563128c1c65ba6c393d53
Message ID: <c=GB%a=%p=CHEMSON%l=CSH_NT0-961106104748Z-3821@csa-ntx.chemson.com>
Reply To: _N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-06 10:44:52 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 02:44:52 -0800 (PST)
Raw message
From: "Butler, Scott" <SButler@chemson.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 02:44:52 -0800 (PST)
To: "'IMCEAX400-c=GB+3Ba=+20+3Bp=CHEMSON+3Bo=CSH+3Bdda+3ASMTP=CYPHERPUNKS+40TOAD+2ECOM+3B@chemson.com>
Subject: FW: Now we have it all
Message-ID: <c=GB%a=_%p=CHEMSON%l=CSH_NT0-961106104748Z-3821@csa-ntx.chemson.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>
Abaddon wrote:
>>susbscribe
Surely we have seen it all now.
I find it hard to believe that a word like
suscribe....subsribe....subcribes..
SUBSCRIBE..is so difficult to spell correctly.
:-)
ScOtT
Thread
Return to November 1996
- Return to ““Butler, Scott” <SButler@chemson.com>”
Return to ““Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>”
- 1996-11-06 (Wed, 6 Nov 1996 02:44:52 -0800 (PST)) - FW: Now we have it all - “Butler, Scott” <SButler@chemson.com>
- 1996-11-06 (Wed, 6 Nov 1996 10:01:53 -0800 (PST)) - Re: FW: Now we have it all - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>