1996-11-02 - Re: Dr. Vulis is not on cypherpunks any more

Header Data

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
Message Hash: 8004cee03d93d9cd476b01431cab2b9581ba47d3e4f22a547ef68ec1f42d3be2
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961102153652.8716A-100000@crl.crl.com>
Reply To: <3.0.32.19961102103422.00742504@mail.teleport.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-02 23:54:19 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 2 Nov 1996 15:54:19 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 1996 15:54:19 -0800 (PST)
To: Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
Subject: Re: Dr. Vulis is not on cypherpunks any more
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19961102103422.00742504@mail.teleport.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961102153652.8716A-100000@crl.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          SANDY SANDFORT
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Rich,

On Sat, 2 Nov 1996, Rich Burroughs wrote:

> Are people on this list not sophisticated enough to be capable
> of filtering his posts if they don't like to read them?

The short answer is, No.  More specifically, we constantly have
a stream of new readers sampling Cypherpunks.  Some are 
technically sophisticated; some are not.  In either case, new
readers do not have the historical perspective not to fall for
Dimitri's big lies.  Nor do they have any way of know what an
abberation his sort of behavior is on this list.  "So this is
what Cypherpunks are like," would be a sad, but understandable
misinterpretation of what we're all about.  What John did was 
appropriate.


 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~







Thread