1996-11-16 - Re: Fat Cocksucker John Gilmore-ASSHOLE!

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Message Hash: 87690788eca041121595e425f0c045a6f2e8d133c3ae4062961151ac707a1f81
Message ID: <o8uHXD17w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <199611161028.EAA12575@mailhost.onramp.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-16 17:20:48 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 16 Nov 1996 09:20:48 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 1996 09:20:48 -0800 (PST)
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Subject: Re: Fat Cocksucker John Gilmore-ASSHOLE!
In-Reply-To: <199611161028.EAA12575@mailhost.onramp.net>
Message-ID: <o8uHXD17w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


aga <aga@dhp.com> writes:
> > (So what if John decided simply to pull the plug on toad in order to
> > plug in a new hot tub?)
>
> So what the fuck?  That matters not.  The point is that the
> cypherpunks is an "all or nothing" proposition.  There is no
> "in between" allowed any more.  After a certain level, EVERYTHING
> reaches the "public doamin," and that is the *common-law of
> cyberspace.*

He might as well - he's got zero credibility. Let him soak in the hot
tub with all the Cygnus Support employees, whose biggest qualification
for getting a job with John Gilmore is to have a big dick.

> Like, why is the fatso John Gilmore out here talking about this?
> Steve Boursy says all of this should go to UseNet, so it goes.

Yes - remember how John Gilmore opposed creating an unmoderated cypherpunks
newsgroup, so he could stay in "control"?

> We want John Gilmore to respond to this censorous matter on the net.

He tried to keep his censorship secret, but he's been forced to talk about it.
In fact, he called his shameful actions "an act of leadership". He sounds
like Hitler.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread