From: nobody@cypherpunks.ca (John Anonymous MacDonald)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9654758ded05c8f6daf20f91bd8eac61bf0a309c8ea7705b0940494b43e6e8dc
Message ID: <199611160458.UAA17262@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-16 05:05:07 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 21:05:07 -0800 (PST)
From: nobody@cypherpunks.ca (John Anonymous MacDonald)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 21:05:07 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: IDEA patent
Message-ID: <199611160458.UAA17262@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
IDEA is a good algorithm much faster than 3DES and
probably stronger but its not very popular outside
of PGP because it is patented.
I remember someone posting here or in another
crypto list about a modified keyschedual to allow
keys of weird size.
My question is could this modification or
something more proven like PRNG-generated subkeys
be used to avoid the IDEA patent? Everyone says it
only takes a small change to avoid a patent. The
problem is a small change can break an algorithm.
Some algorithms like Blowfish generate subkeys
from a PRNG so it might be a safe change for IDEA.
I'm posting this anonymously because I dont know
what peoples feelings are on patent avoidance.
Return to November 1996
Return to “nobody@cypherpunks.ca (John Anonymous MacDonald)”
1996-11-16 (Fri, 15 Nov 1996 21:05:07 -0800 (PST)) - IDEA patent - nobody@cypherpunks.ca (John Anonymous MacDonald)