From: ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)
To: “Daniel T. Hagan” <dhagan@vt.edu>
Message Hash: 9ea62a9460359b1e09196e847aec8cefec70a839addd70493799057f7954592c
Message ID: <v02140b0baea80ee121af@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-07 22:24:49 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 14:24:49 -0800 (PST)
From: ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 14:24:49 -0800 (PST)
To: "Daniel T. Hagan" <dhagan@vt.edu>
Subject: Re: Why is cryptoanarchy irreversible?
Message-ID: <v02140b0baea80ee121af@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> If I understand the reasoning, people beleive it is easier to prevent the
> release of strong crypto. techiniques than to remove them once they are
> released.
The reasons underlying this are what I don't completely understand.
> Once a terrorist has strong crypto, why should they stop using it if it
> becomes illegal?
Use of strong crypto would be a tip off that one is a terrorist.
If strong cryptography were unpopular and highly illegal, very few
people would be using it. This makes it easy to identify suspects.
Peter Hendrickson
ph@netcom.com
Return to November 1996
Return to ““Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>”