From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a4ea3fee5bbfe5b537c817b86c2847417f3ee6c9d9ca4a2a3316e749944d57e1
Message ID: <3.0b36.32.19961120210120.00758920@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-21 02:01:12 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 18:01:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 18:01:12 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Anon
Message-ID: <3.0b36.32.19961120210120.00758920@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 12:06 PM 11/20/96 -0700, Roderick Simpson wrote:
>Who has made the strongest case _against_ anonymity on the Net that you
>have ever heard? Someone intelligent and theoretical rather than trapped in
>some child porn or commerce pov.
>
>Thanks,
>Rod
Recruiting for a future Brain Tennis I take it?
The Thursday Computer columnist for the WSJ (whose name escapes me) is a
possibility. I don't know how strong he is but he is consistently opposed.
I wouldn't recommend L. Detweiler though he is opposed to anonymity.
How about Esther Dyson?
DCF
Return to November 1996
Return to “Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>”
1996-11-21 (Wed, 20 Nov 1996 18:01:12 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Anon - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>