1996-11-21 - Re: Anon

Header Data

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a4ea3fee5bbfe5b537c817b86c2847417f3ee6c9d9ca4a2a3316e749944d57e1
Message ID: <3.0b36.32.19961120210120.00758920@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-21 02:01:12 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 18:01:12 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 18:01:12 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Anon
Message-ID: <3.0b36.32.19961120210120.00758920@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 12:06 PM 11/20/96 -0700, Roderick Simpson wrote:
>Who has made the strongest case _against_ anonymity on the Net that you
>have ever heard? Someone intelligent and theoretical rather than trapped in
>some child porn or commerce pov.
>
>Thanks,
>Rod

Recruiting for a future Brain Tennis I take it?

The Thursday Computer columnist for the WSJ (whose name escapes me) is a
possibility.  I don't know how strong he is but he is consistently opposed.

I wouldn't recommend L. Detweiler though he is opposed to anonymity.

How about Esther Dyson?

DCF





Thread