From: Matts Kallioniemi <matts@cyberpass.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: adc9de50d269ed4fac90574fa5685656d255da98d068cc89441d7c17e532729a
Message ID: <3.0b36.32.19961108144638.00a11c90@cyberpass.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-08 13:46:22 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 05:46:22 -0800 (PST)
From: Matts Kallioniemi <matts@cyberpass.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 05:46:22 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Why is cryptoanarchy irreversible?
Message-ID: <3.0b36.32.19961108144638.00a11c90@cyberpass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 17:12 1996-11-07 -0800, jim bell wrote:
>Simple analogy: Suppose you put two people into a room with a deck of
>playing cards and a table, instructing "Person A" to build a house-of-cards,
>and telling "Person B" to stop him from achieving his goal. Who do you
>think will win? Obviously, the latter will win: It's vastly easier to
>knock such a structure down than to build it in the first place, and all
>"Person B" has to do is occasionally take a whack at the structure.
What if Person A is better armed? Could that change the outcome?
Return to November 1996
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”