1996-11-15 - Re: Validating SSNs

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <rcgraves@ix.netcom.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b457b278efe1cdb83ab76eeef5061377f3f4124a61e24d59a119e95370fc9192
Message ID: <328D0286.4075@ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: <v03007801aeb10f2b94a1@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-15 23:54:18 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 15:54:18 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <rcgraves@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 15:54:18 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Validating SSNs
In-Reply-To: <v03007801aeb10f2b94a1@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <328D0286.4075@ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Timothy C. May wrote:
> 
> Indeed, I protected my privacy decades ago by discarding my issued SSN 
> and substituting a different one. This "phony SSN" is what I use on my 
> tax returns, my credit cards, and for my employers.
> 
> Ha! None of them know that this is not my True Social Security Number!
> 
> By this I protect my privacy.

Brilliant! Little do they know that when they analyze your spending 
patterns, your addresses, your employment, your education, and your 
kids, they're really investigating something that has NOTHING TO DO WITH 
YOU!

[Just in case there are people too thick to understand "subtlety."] 

-rich





Thread