From: “George A. Stathis” <hyperlex@hol.gr>
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Message Hash: ba5c65bd3aa734bbe2077fc63f4c002887c74b5cadbc188d99e38c43fa9d0ad3
Message ID: <199611171514.NAA01626@prometheus.hol.gr>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-17 11:15:38 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 03:15:38 -0800 (PST)
From: "George A. Stathis" <hyperlex@hol.gr>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 03:15:38 -0800 (PST)
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Subject: Re: Does John Gilmore...(CORRECTION)
Message-ID: <199611171514.NAA01626@prometheus.hol.gr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 12:40 ìì 17/11/1996 -0200, George A. Stathis wrote:
>In Logic, Complete Systems are Consistent, and Consistent Systems
>are Incomplete. Thus, 'extreme views' of any kind are impractical.
>(theorem of Goedel in Logic and Mathematics applied in practice).
Boy oh Boy! time to flame myself this time:
"Complete Systems are INconsistent, and Consistent Systems
are INcomplete". At least in the Predicate Calculus.
This is why I look forward to Dimitri explaining his 'Cancelbot'
in detail. It's possible that the _misuse_ of such an innovation
would be against the original goal (of Spam-elimination etc).
In any case, while you all go to sleep, it's me for me to do some work!
:-)
George
Return to November 1996
Return to ““George A. Stathis” <hyperlex@hol.gr>”
1996-11-17 (Sun, 17 Nov 1996 03:15:38 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Does John Gilmore…(CORRECTION) - “George A. Stathis” <hyperlex@hol.gr>