From: Hendra Halim <mestimas@elang.idola.net.id>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 21:40:22 -0800 (PST)
To: CYPHERPUNKS@toad.com
Subject: Re: FW: Now we have it all
Message-ID: <9611070543.AA26834@merak.idola.net.id>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>X-Sender: tcmay@mail.got.net
>Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 10:04:52 -0800
>To: CYPHERPUNKS@toad.com
>From: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
>Subject: Re: FW: Now we have it all
>Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
>
>At 10:47 AM +0100 11/6/96, Butler, Scott wrote:
>>>
>>Abaddon wrote:
>>
>>>>susbscribe
>>
>>Surely we have seen it all now.
>>I find it hard to believe that a word like
>>suscribe....subsribe....subcribes..
>>SUBSCRIBE..is so difficult to spell correctly.
>>
>>:-)
>
>This is actually steganography. Various spellings of "subscribe" are being
>used to communicate a bit or two per message.
>
>Actually, the practice becomes a code, as in:
>
>"Suscrive if by sea, sudcribe if by land."
>
>
>--Klaus! von Future Prime
>
>
>Please unsubscribe me from your list
>
>
>Hendra