1996-11-19 - Re: The Utility of Privacy

Header Data

From: The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
To: John Anonymous MacDonald <nobody@cypherpunks.ca>
Message Hash: ce626dedb963c5f078b5dbcc708806494ed6f14428bd8384a2faf76f79c761ac
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.94.961119045250.1139A-100000@random.sp.org>
Reply To: <199611182000.MAA23957@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-19 04:56:31 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 20:56:31 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 20:56:31 -0800 (PST)
To: John Anonymous MacDonald <nobody@cypherpunks.ca>
Subject: Re: The Utility of Privacy
In-Reply-To: <199611182000.MAA23957@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.94.961119045250.1139A-100000@random.sp.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Mon, 18 Nov 1996, John Anonymous MacDonald wrote:

> 
> At 11:13 PM 11/17/1996, Huge Cajones Remailer wrote:
> > Examples?
> 
> How about the draft?  The privacy protected child has options the
> others do not.  Legal risk okay - beats getting shot.

Of course, if they fully instate the draft, and you don't fill out the
forms, they'll prosecute you for treason, and then they gas you (which is 
usually much more painfull and damaging than being shot is).

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for privacy; this just isn't the best example.

> diGriz

 --Deviant
Blood flows down one leg and up the other.







Thread