From: Omegaman <omega@bigeasy.com>
To: attila@primenet.com
Message Hash: ddc4ad7728dfa717237c43cb632176faeb56549e51c95b850acf6e3ec71efbab
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961127083929.386A-100000@jolietjake.com>
Reply To: <199611270417.VAA15665@infowest.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-27 13:35:57 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 05:35:57 -0800 (PST)
From: Omegaman <omega@bigeasy.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 05:35:57 -0800 (PST)
To: attila@primenet.com
Subject: Re: Another Nutty Idea about SPAM
In-Reply-To: <199611270417.VAA15665@infowest.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961127083929.386A-100000@jolietjake.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Wed, 27 Nov 1996 attila@primenet.com wrote:
> well, I've always figured that people are basically OK
> until proven otherwise --or their is money involved.
> then there are lawyers....
>
</devil's advocate mode>
That's the crux of my point. The spammer's fundamental motivation is money.
People who don't want to receive bulk mailings won't spend money with the
spammers. However, many spammers don't see it that way. "What's in it for
me?" ie. who's gonna pay the spammer for NOT sending his bulk e-mail just
because some folks don't want it.
</end devil's advocate mode>
me
_______________________________________________________________
Omegaman <mailto:omega@bigeasy.com>
PGP Key fingerprint = 6D 31 C3 00 77 8C D1 C2
59 0A 01 E3 AF 81 94 63
Send e-mail with "get key" in the "Subject:"
field to get a copy of my public key
_______________________________________________________________
Return to November 1996
Return to “Omegaman <omega@bigeasy.com>”