From: “Murray Hayes” <mhayes@infomatch.com>
To: “Bill Frantz” <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: e5e2e55cf069787cc7d4e94d4150ffec3139219e4b8b2933ae9904b59aa332a5
Message ID: <199611190750.XAA19020@infomatch.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-19 07:51:03 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 23:51:03 -0800 (PST)
From: "Murray Hayes" <mhayes@infomatch.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 23:51:03 -0800 (PST)
To: "Bill Frantz" <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: It is getting easier
Message-ID: <199611190750.XAA19020@infomatch.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 15 Nov 1996 13:02:10 -0800, Bill Frantz wrote:
>At 11:25 PM 11/14/96 -0800, Lucky Green wrote:
>>If I remember correctly, some of the newer transponders used on
>>commercial aircraft actually transmit GPS data back to the controller in
>>real time. I wonder how long it will be before the FAA will include such
>>information in their database.
>
>I don't think new transponders make much difference. The old ones heighten
>the radar image of the airplane which gives an accurate 2D position. This
>position is automatically entered into the FAA computer which maintains the
>ATC controller's display. In the old style, altitude is determined by an
>altimeter on the airplane which encoded into the transponder signal.
>
>If newer transponders are returning GPS signals, the position may be more
>accurate (but probably not unless they can decode the selective
>availability signal). (OBCrypto for those who care.)
>
>
>>"To obtain the position of any passenger flight in the US within 10
>>meters, click here."
>
>In either case, the Passenger Name Records for the flight are in the
>airlines databases (and have been there for many years), and the airplane's
>physical position is in the FAA's computer (and has been for many years).
>The ability to find the current position of an airplane, or a passenger
>remains dependent on the incentives and disincentives for database linking
>and application development. There are no insurmountable technical
>problems. The technical problems are those of getting old-technology
>software to do something new.
>
Wouldn't it be a breach of privacy to alow anyone to know the location
of a passanger? A plane maybe, but the roster of passangers is
protected by the Privacy Act.
just my 2 cents.
mhayes@infomatch.com
It's better for us if you don't understand
It's better for me if you don't understand
-Tragically Hip
Return to November 1996
Return to ““Murray Hayes” <mhayes@infomatch.com>”
1996-11-19 (Mon, 18 Nov 1996 23:51:03 -0800 (PST)) - Re: It is getting easier - “Murray Hayes” <mhayes@infomatch.com>