1996-11-12 - Re: two bogus messages to this list

Header Data

From: Jim Wise <jim@santafe.arch.columbia.edu>
To: N/A
Message Hash: f80e2c5b3acdde8204d5d1b227495bfc9431bfd8ea1ea1d5129940005f5c0389
Message ID: <Pine.NEB.3.94.961112014731.25826A-100000@localhost>
Reply To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961111182838.3985C-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-12 06:44:10 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 22:44:10 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Jim Wise <jim@santafe.arch.columbia.edu>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 22:44:10 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: two bogus messages to this list
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961111182838.3985C-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.94.961112014731.25826A-100000@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Mon, 11 Nov 1996, Rabid Wombat wrote:

> Um, not to disagree with you re Intel/Micro$loth, but most UNIX systems 
> can be brought up in single-user mode and the root password changed by 
> anyone with physical access to the system. You could end up with even 
> more trouble than if someone messed with your M$ box.

This is far over-simplified.  Most BSD derived Unices provide the _option_
for single-user mode not to be password protected (depending on whether the
console is marked secure in /etc/ttys).  A few default to this behavior,
but on all it is either a configuration choice or a password is always
required (as it is in USG'ish unices).

--

				Jim Wise
				System Administrator
				GSAPP, Columbia University
				jim@santafe.arch.columbia.edu
				http://www.arch.columbia.edu/~jim
				* Finger for PGP public key *






Thread