From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: Ross Wright <rwright@adnetsol.com>
Message Hash: fa5ebb4baaaa7f99c3f4957d76087b798bf64d901264bd51a92bd569112e37ba
Message ID: <327D5E70.69B5@gte.net>
Reply To: <199611031759.JAA05324@adnetsol.adnetsol.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-04 03:27:15 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Nov 1996 19:27:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 1996 19:27:15 -0800 (PST)
To: Ross Wright <rwright@adnetsol.com>
Subject: Re: [NOISE]Re: Dr. Vulis
In-Reply-To: <199611031759.JAA05324@adnetsol.adnetsol.com>
Message-ID: <327D5E70.69B5@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Ross Wright wrote:
> On or About 3 Nov 96 at 14:46, Derek Bell wrote:
> > I'm not happy with the barring of Vulis from the list
> Just want to add my 2 cents. I am also unhappy with the fact that he was removed.
> My personal correspondence with Vulis has been friendly and he has been very helpful.
Someone (Gilmore?) mentioned new subscribers being a problem, not knowing how to filter
and so on. Would periodic postings for new subscribers, in addition to the initial
welcome message, be a possible solve for this?
Please don't curse me for this next idea, as I'm not really familiar with what goes on
on a mail server: How about if everyone could send to the list with the subject line
containing in [] brackets one of several strings from a list maintained by the server,
examples being [NOISE], [RANT], [CRYPTO], [NEWS] etc., and for postings without one of
the selections, the line could default to [NOISE] or whatever.
I don't mean to propose anything heavy-handed, but there ought to be a way to apply
a *little* more technology to get a *little* cleaner list, without impeding the "lower
end" of the signal. Unless, of course, there are other technical or personal reasons
for blocking the "Doctor" that I'm not aware of.
Return to November 1996
Return to “Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>”