From: "Matthew J. Miszewski" <mjmiski@execpc.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 22:41:48 -0800 (PST)
To: nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
Subject: Re: Redlining
Message-ID: <3.0.32.19961211004126.00698998@execpc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 05:47 PM 12/10/96 -0800, Huge Cajones Remailer wrote:
(snip)
>
>Do we then believe that we should outlaw the actions they take based
>on these beliefs?  So long as the people in question are doing no
>harm, I propose we leave them alone to live their lives.
>

This is the essence of, at least, my disagreement with you Red.  I dont
agree that redlining doesnt harm people.  You see no harm.  I do.

>I'm sure many readers of this list have had conversations which
>abruptly end with "Are you a Libertarian?", which is generally
>completely irrelevant to the point under discussion.  What is
>happening is that the other person is more interested in knowing your
>tribal identification than what you believe.  A pity.

As strange as it may sound to you, most of my conversations go this way.
It is ironic to me that I have been placed on this side of an argument.  Do
you tend to think of me now as "less of a Libertarian" much as your
forewarned "In the House" black reference?


>
>Red Rackham
>

Matt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMq5XjbpijqL8wiT1AQGb4QQAlfkJjGxTli09WNWmKO5xL1raxv52ccQ7
WKPdLclQDhXD8rMrQQr85WgOhm6d/dEwJ0n8LKCz5i7OOuDE1YufgMBjQste9/Ul
GJodjM4dbxDDqxdErPtIWTkkhTDNKqHNoZXMvQCDmYfQrBnRfsiOJcwXaz7sqoNF
f+JHUSPjHGY=
=q6bO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----